The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
refers to legislation that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case legislation, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” provides a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, and how They're applied in certain types of case.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment to the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that though the crime of murder was founded, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for looking at mitigating factors during sentencing.
Even though there is not any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is no precedent from the home state, relevant case law from another state could be viewed as via the court.
Individual researchers working on defined research projects meant for scholarly work can utilize the connected form (PDF) to request PACER payment exemptions from multiple courts.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It's also a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're in the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be considered, however, we've been crystal clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject matter to the approval from the competent authority. Read more
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that among the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out because of the counsel for that respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
department concerned shall supply the complete set of ACRs of the concerned officer to DPC perfectly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court from the United States. Decreased courts about the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every check here state has its individual judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is frequently referred to given that the “supreme” court, While there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Even though state courts can also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
10. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion will be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion might be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for turning into entitled to be deemed for promotion to the higher grade, of course, is just not without logic given that the officer who's at first inducted to the particular post needs to provide around the explained post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public inside a befitting fashion.
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them for being healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)